5 Watch Investment Myths That Cost Collectors Real Money
By Ultimate Diamond | 47th Street, NYC
I'm going to say something that might cost me some business: most of what you've read about watches as investments is wrong. Not slightly wrong. Dangerously wrong. The kind of wrong that has people buying $30,000 watches expecting them to appreciate like index funds.
I sell watches. I love watches. I've built my business around watches. And I'm telling you right now: the "watch investment" narrative that took hold during the pandemic has cost regular collectors real money. Let me show you exactly how.
Myth 1: "Rolex Always Goes Up"
This is the big one. The granddaddy of watch investment myths. And it's not entirely false, which makes it more dangerous than a complete lie.
Here's what actually happened. From roughly 2020 to early 2022, the secondary market for Rolex sport models went vertical. A stainless steel Daytona (Ref. 116500LN) that traded for $20,000-$22,000 in January 2020 hit $50,000+ by March 2022. A GMT-Master II "Pepsi" (Ref. 126710BLRO) went from $17,000 to $28,000-$30,000. Even the Submariner Date (Ref. 126610LN), which retails for $10,250, was trading for $18,000-$19,000 on the secondary market.
People saw this and concluded: Rolex always goes up.
Then reality happened. By late 2022, those same Daytonas had dropped to $32,000-$35,000. The Pepsi GMT settled around $19,000-$21,000. The Submariner corrected to $13,000-$14,000. By mid-2023, we were looking at 30-40% declines from the peak across the board.
As of early 2025, the market has stabilized. Daytonas sit around $30,000-$33,000 for the stainless steel version. The GMT-Master II Pepsi is roughly $18,000-$20,000. The Submariner is $12,000-$13,000. These are still above retail and still above 2019 prices, which makes Rolex one of the best-performing luxury goods over a 5-year period. But if you bought in March 2022 at the peak, you're sitting on a 30-40% loss and there is no indication that prices will return to those highs anytime soon.
The truth: Rolex holds value better than any other watch brand. Over long time horizons (10-20 years), most Rolex sport models appreciate in real terms. But "holds value well" and "always goes up" are completely different statements. The 2022-2024 correction proved that Rolex is not immune to bubbles, speculation, or mean reversion.
If you bought a Rolex to wear and you happened to buy during the bubble, you still have a great watch. If you bought a Rolex as a speculative investment at peak prices, you made a mistake. Accept it, wear the watch, and wait it out. Don't panic sell.
Myth 2: "Limited Edition = Valuable"
This one makes me genuinely angry because it's the myth that separates the most people from the most money.
The watch industry has figured out that stamping "Limited Edition" on a caseback is the cheapest way to charge a premium. And collectors keep falling for it. Here's the thing: limited edition means nothing if nobody wants the watch.
Example 1: Hublot Big Bang Unico "Italia Independent" series. Limited to 500 pieces each. Various colorful camouflage patterns. Released around $20,000-$25,000 retail. Secondary market today? $8,000-$10,000. You lost half your money on a "limited" watch.
Example 2: TAG Heuer Monaco Gulf Special Edition (Ref. CAW211R). Limited to 4,000 pieces. Gorgeous blue and orange Gulf livery dial. Retailed around $6,500. Pre-owned today: $3,500-$4,000. The "limited" production run was 4,000 units, which is enormous for a special edition. There was nothing scarce about it.
Example 3: Omega Seamaster "James Bond" limited editions. Omega has released probably a dozen Bond-themed watches over the years. Some hold value (the Spectre and No Time to Die editions, specifically). Most don't. The Quantum of Solace edition? The Casino Royale edition? Secondary market doesn't care. They trade at or below standard Seamaster prices.
Now compare that with watches that weren't marketed as limited editions but turned out to be genuinely scarce:
The Rolex "Hulk" Submariner (Ref. 116610LV). This was a standard production model with a green dial and green bezel. Rolex never called it limited edition. They just stopped making it in 2020 when they released the 126610LV (the "Starbucks"). The Hulk went from $13,000 pre-discontinuation to $18,000-$20,000 post-discontinuation. Genuine scarcity created genuine value.
The lesson: Scarcity that's engineered by marketing (numbered editions, special boxes, certificates of authenticity with holograms) rarely translates to long-term value. Scarcity that's created by discontinuation and organic demand almost always does. Before you buy a limited edition at a premium, ask yourself: would I want this watch if it weren't limited? If the answer is no, walk away.
Myth 3: "Vintage Always Appreciates"
Vintage watches have had an incredible run over the past decade. Prices for vintage Rolex, Omega, Heuer, and Universal Geneve have climbed significantly. And the internet has convinced people that any old watch is a good investment.
It's not.
The winners get all the attention. A vintage Rolex Submariner "Red Sub" (Ref. 1680) from the 1970s in excellent condition can fetch $20,000-$30,000 today. It cost $300 new. That's an insane return. A vintage Omega Speedmaster "Ed White" (Ref. 105.003) from 1965 can bring $30,000-$50,000+ depending on condition and provenance. These stories are real.
But here's what nobody shows you: For every vintage watch that appreciated dramatically, there are fifty that didn't move at all, and ten that actually declined.
Example: Vintage quartz watches. In the 1970s and 1980s, quartz watches from brands like Omega, Longines, and Seiko were cutting-edge technology sold at premium prices. Today, most vintage quartz watches are worth less than what was paid for them, even in nominal terms (forget inflation adjustment). A 1978 Omega Constellation quartz that retailed for $800 might sell for $300-$500 today. In real terms, that's a catastrophic loss.
Example: Vintage gold dress watches from lesser brands. The market for vintage gold-cased dress watches from brands like Movado, Wittnauer, and Bulova has been essentially flat for 20 years. Some have even declined as the trend toward sport watches continues. A beautiful 1960s Movado dress watch in 14k gold might fetch $800-$1,200 today. Adjust for inflation from what it cost new, and you've lost money.
Example: Vintage watches in poor condition. This is the trap I see most often. Someone buys a "bargain" vintage Rolex on eBay for $4,000 because comparable examples sell for $7,000. Then they discover it needs a $2,000 service, the dial has been refinished (killing the originality premium), and the bracelet is a replacement. Their $4,000 bargain is now a $6,000 watch that's worth $5,000 because the market discounts non-original components heavily.
The truth about vintage: The watches that appreciate are the ones that were desirable when new, from brands that still have cultural relevance, in original condition, with documented provenance. That's a tiny fraction of all vintage watches ever made. Everything else is just an old watch.
Myth 4: "Buy the Hype"
The Patek Philippe Nautilus (Ref. 5711/1A) is the poster child for hype-driven pricing, and it's the single best case study in why chasing hype is a losing strategy for most people.
Here's the timeline:
2019: The stainless steel Nautilus 5711/1A retails for roughly $30,000 (if you could get one, which you couldn't). Secondary market price: $60,000-$70,000. Already a significant premium over retail.
2021: Patek Philippe announces the discontinuation of the 5711/1A in its current form. Panic buying ensues. Secondary market price rockets to $120,000-$150,000. The final production run with the olive green dial (Ref. 5711/1A-014) hits $200,000+ at auction.
2022 peak: Stainless steel Nautilus references across the board hit all-time highs. People are paying $100,000+ for a steel watch with a retail price of $35,000.
2023-2024: The correction. Nautilus prices drop 30-40% from peak. The 5711/1A-010 (blue dial) that was trading at $130,000 settles to $80,000-$90,000. The 5811/1G (the replacement in white gold) trades at $100,000-$110,000, down from $150,000+.
The people who got burned: Anyone who bought at or near the peak expecting continued appreciation. If you paid $130,000 for a 5711 in early 2022 and you're looking at $85,000 market value in 2025, you've lost $45,000. That's not a rounding error. That's a luxury car.
The Nautilus bubble was driven by the same forces that drive all bubbles: narrative ("it's discontinued!"), social proof ("everyone wants one"), and the greater fool theory ("someone will pay even more"). When those forces reversed, the correction was swift and painful.
The lesson: Hype creates real price movements in the short term. But buying into hype at elevated prices means you need the hype to continue indefinitely, which it never does. The people who made money on the Nautilus bought at or near retail years ago and sold during the frenzy. The people who lost money bought the frenzy expecting more frenzy. Don't be the second group.
The parallel example: The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak (Ref. 15500ST) followed a nearly identical pattern. Retail $23,000, peak secondary $55,000+, current secondary $38,000-$42,000. Anyone who bought at peak is underwater.
Myth 5: "Watch Funds Are Smart"
This is the newest myth and potentially the most damaging. Over the past few years, several companies have launched "watch funds" or "fractional watch ownership" platforms. The pitch is simple: pool your money with other investors, a professional buys high-end watches, the watches appreciate, everyone profits.
Let me explain why this almost never works.
The fee structure kills you. Most watch funds charge a management fee of 1-2% annually, plus an acquisition fee of 3-5% when watches are purchased, plus a disposition fee of 5-10% when watches are sold. Some also charge a performance fee (typically 20% of profits) on top of all that.
Let's do the math on a hypothetical $100,000 investment:
- Acquisition fee (4%): you immediately lose $4,000. Your $100,000 becomes $96,000 in watch value.
- Annual management fee (1.5%): that's $1,500 per year. Over a 5-year hold, that's $7,500.
- Disposition fee (7%): when the watches sell, you lose another 7% of the sale price.
- Performance fee (20% of profits): if the watches appreciated, you give up a fifth of the gain.
For your $100,000 to return $100,000 (break even) after 5 years of fees, the watches need to appreciate roughly 25-30%. Over 5 years. In a market where the best-performing brand (Rolex) averages maybe 5-8% annual appreciation on its most desirable references.
The math doesn't work. It doesn't even come close for most watch categories. The only scenario where a watch fund makes money for investors is if they happen to hold pieces that experience a 2020-2022 style bubble. And as we just discussed, bubbles are followed by corrections.
The liquidity problem. Real estate funds, stock funds, and bond funds deal in assets with deep, liquid markets and transparent pricing. The watch market has none of that. There's no central exchange. Pricing is opaque. A watch is worth what someone will pay for it on the day you want to sell. Watch funds that need to liquidate positions to meet redemption requests often have to sell at below-market prices because they need to move quickly.
The expertise question. Who's picking the watches? Are they experienced dealers with decades of market knowledge, or are they finance guys who took a watch appreciation course and launched a fund? I've met both. The finance guys consistently overpay for watches because they lack the dealer relationships and market instincts that come from years of hands-on experience.
The alternative: If you have $100,000 to invest in watches, buy 3-4 excellent pieces yourself. A Rolex Daytona, a Patek Aquanaut, an AP Royal Oak, and maybe a vintage Omega Speedmaster. You'll pay zero management fees, zero performance fees, and maybe 5-10% in dealer margin when you buy and sell. Over 5 years, you'll almost certainly outperform any watch fund, and you get to actually wear the watches.
What Actually Works
I've been in this business long enough to know what actually builds value in a watch collection. Here it is:
Buy what you'll wear. If you never sell, you never realize a loss. The best "investment" is a watch you love wearing that happens to hold its value. That's Rolex sport models, Patek Philippe core collection, AP Royal Oak, and a handful of others.
Buy in boring times, not exciting ones. When the watch market is hot and prices are spiking, that's the worst time to buy. When the market is quiet, dealers are more negotiable, and you get better value. I sell more watches at better prices (for the buyer) in slow months than in frenzied ones.
Condition is everything. A mint-condition example of a common reference will outperform a beat-up example of a desirable reference over time. Collectors pay for condition. Always.
Buy the brand, not the complication. A simple Patek Calatrava will hold value better than a complicated watch from a lesser brand. Brand equity matters more than mechanical complexity in the secondary market.
Don't buy what you can't afford to lose. If losing 30% of the watch's value would cause you financial stress, you can't afford the watch. Period. Watches are luxury goods, not Treasury bills. Treat them accordingly.
The Bottom Line
Watches can be a reasonable store of value. Certain references from certain brands have genuine long-term appreciation potential. But the moment you start thinking of your watch as an investment vehicle comparable to stocks, bonds, or real estate, you're making a category error that will likely cost you money.
Buy watches because they bring you joy. Buy them from brands with strong resale histories. Pay fair prices. Take care of them. And if they appreciate, consider it a bonus rather than a business plan.
That's the honest advice from a dealer who'd rather have a customer for life than a one-time sale on a hyped piece that leaves a bad taste.
Ultimate Diamond is a trusted dealer on NYC's Diamond District, 47th Street. We buy, sell, and trade luxury watches and fine jewelry. No appointment necessary.